| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? |
| Date: | 2019-01-21 19:19:14 |
| Message-ID: | 5C461B32.8020403@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/21/19 13:14, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Of course, the text would also be clickable, right? I think putting the
>> URL in a footnote is good in that case; it works both on screen and on
>> paper, which should alleviate JD's concerns.
>
> Yeah I could see that. I thought about that but was wondering if it was
It looks like the easiest way to integrate such a behavior into the
current Makefile would be not as a separate DocBook->DocBook transform
in advance, but simply by editing the existing stylesheet-fo.xsl that
produces the FO input for generating the PDF.
That would mean learning some FO, which I've wanted to do for a while,
but haven't yet, so it stops looking like something I might experiment
with this afternoon. OTOH, it could mean more flexibility in how the
presentation should look.
I note in passing that the google result [1] is nonempty....
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-21 19:27:50 | should ConstraintRelationId ins/upd cause relcache invals? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-01-21 19:06:41 | Re: What to name the current heap after pluggable storage / what to rename? |