Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Date: 2019-01-21 08:17:53
Message-ID: 5C458031.2000906@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

(2019/01/19 21:17), Amit Langote wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:58 PM Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I updated the patch as such and rebased it to the latest HEAD. I also
>> added the commit message. Attached is an updated patch. Does that make
>> sense? If there are no objections, I'll push that patch early next week.
>
> Thank you. Looks good to me.

Cool. Pushed after tweaking the commit message based on the feedback
from Justin offlist and a self-review.

Thanks everyone who worked on this!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-01-21 08:21:46 Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2019-01-21 07:48:02 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-01-21 08:21:46 Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-01-19 12:17:34 Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0