| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled. |
| Date: | 2018-08-02 11:12:15 |
| Message-ID: | 5B62E70F.10400@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/08/02 2:44), Robert Haas wrote:
> Tom, Ashutosh, and I all seem to agree that we shouldn't try to
> re-jigger things at create-plan time. I think that a 3-1 consensus
> against your proposal is sufficient to say we shouldn't go that way.
Agreed.
> Now, here you've got a new approach which avoids that, which I have
> not yet reviewed. I'll try to spend some time on it this afternoon,
> but really, I think it's too late for this. This bug was reported in
> February, and we're supposed to be pushing 11 final out the door in
> not much more than a month. Proposing a new approach in August is not
> good.
Agreed.
> Can't we just do what Ashutosh proposed for now and revisit
> this for v12?
I think that may be possible.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-08-02 11:20:03 | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled. |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-08-02 10:18:11 | Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations |