| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled. |
| Date: | 2018-08-01 11:46:48 |
| Message-ID: | 5B619DA8.30801@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/08/01 5:31), Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-31, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> (2018/07/31 4:06), Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-20 08:38:09 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> I'm going to study this some more now, but I really think this is
>>>> going in the wrong direction.
>>>
>>> We're going to have to get somewhere on this topic soon. This thread has
>>> been open for nearly half a year, and we're late in the beta phase now.
>>> What can we do to get to an agreement soon?
>>
>> I'd like to propose an updated patch as proposed in [1].
>
> But there is no patch there, and neither there is agreement from the
> other party that the approach described there is sound.
I posted the updated patch [1].
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5B619D23.4010000%40lab.ntt.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arthur Zakirov | 2018-08-01 12:17:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-08-01 11:44:35 | Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled. |