Re: Automated bottleneck detection

From: MichaelDBA <MichaelDBA(at)sqlexec(dot)com>
To: Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Automated bottleneck detection
Date: 2018-07-26 12:05:10
Message-ID: 5B59B8F6.4070703@sqlexec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Wow, freakin cool, can't wait to start fiddling with pg_wait_sampling.
Reckon we can get lightweight locks and spinlocks history with this cool
new extension instead of awkwardly and repeatedly querying the
pg_stat_activity table.

Regards,
Michael Vitale

> Thomas Güttler <mailto:guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de>
> Thursday, July 26, 2018 7:27 AM
> This sound good. Looks like an automated bootleneck detection
> could be possible with pg_wait_sampling.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolas Even 2018-07-26 15:53:33 Query with "ILIKE ALL" does not use the index
Previous Message Thomas Güttler 2018-07-26 11:27:38 Automated bottleneck detection