| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF bug fix items |
| Date: | 2018-06-11 11:49:11 |
| Message-ID: | 5B1E61B7.60306@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/06/11 20:34), Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 07:08 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> In one of those cases, "ConvertRowtypeExpr reference errors from
>>> partition-wise join", the patch has been marked Ready for Committer and
>>> then Etsuro seems to have changeed his mind. If it's not ready it should
>>> be set back to "needs review" or "waiting for author".
>>
>> Yeah, I don't think the proposed patch is the right way to go, so I'm
>> proposing another solution for that, which I think makes code much
>> simple, but I'd like to hear the opinion from Robert, who is the owner
>> of PWJ. (I marked this as Ready for Committer partly because I wanted
>> to hear the opinion.)
>
> I don't think that's the way we should use "Ready for Committer". I
> suggest you ,move it back to "Needs Review".
Done.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-06-11 12:43:52 | Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-11 11:34:30 | Re: CF bug fix items |