| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions |
| Date: | 2018-04-26 06:44:17 |
| Message-ID: | 5AE17541.7000806@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/04/26 15:39), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/04/26 15:27, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> Here is a new version I'd like to propose for fixing this issue without
>> the former patch.
> Sorry, didn't notice this before sending my patch, which I also marked v7.
>
> It's a bit different than yours and has comments with excerpts from your
> earlier versions. See if you find it helpful.
OK, will review your version.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-04-26 07:29:37 | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2018-04-26 06:40:12 | Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes |