Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Date: 2018-03-31 00:07:31
Message-ID: 5ABED143.80605@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/30/18 19:57, Michael Paquier wrote:

> look for tools using XLP_BKP_REMOVABLE. One is pglesslog that we
> already know about. However I have to be honest, I have not been able
> to find its source code,

I'm glad it wasn't just me.

-Chap

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2018-03-31 00:08:45 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-30 23:57:57 Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility