| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: numeric regression test passes, but why? |
| Date: | 2018-01-12 01:54:53 |
| Message-ID: | 5A58156D.7000307@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/11/18 11:30, Chapman Flack wrote:
> And indeed, my starting message in this thread was that, even in my
> recent (e35dba475a440f73dccf9ed1fd61e3abc6ee61db) build, make check
> *succeeds*, and for all I can tell, that test *is* executed (it shows
> up in the log, and if I re-run it with digits altered, it fails).
>
> And then I can connect interactively to the same server (started
> fresh, not the same instance 'make check' was running, haven't tried
As I began to suspect around that time, but couldn't check until now,
that's what was going wrong: my wrapper script for starting the server
was starting the wrong one, because it added a $PWD-relative entry to PATH,
and I had cd'd when looking for the test code last night, and then hadn't
noticed a different server version was being started.
(I feel a little better ... I'm not insane ... just inattentive at times.)
Sorry for the false alarm.
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-01-12 01:57:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-01-12 01:48:40 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |