Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date: 2010-04-26 15:04:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, April 26, 2010 09:43, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 23:52 +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> I'll try to repeat this pattern on other hardware; although
>> if my tests were run with faulty hardware I wouldn't know how/why
>> that would give the above effect (such a 'regular aberration').
>> testing is more difficult than I thought...
> Thanks again for your help.
> Please can you confirm:
> * Are the standby tests run while the primary is completely quiet?

autovacuum was on. Which is probably not a good idea - I'll try a few runs without it.

> * What OS is this? Can we use dtrace scripts?

Centos 5.4.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Murali M. KrishnaDate: 2010-04-26 17:43:26
Subject: Discarding the resulting rows
Previous:From: Erik RijkersDate: 2010-04-26 15:01:41
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group