| From: | "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Date: | 2010-04-26 15:04:09 |
| Message-ID: | 59f35a8ab4d22cb011d2fe8acdee7637.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, April 26, 2010 09:43, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 23:52 +0200, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
>> I'll try to repeat this pattern on other hardware; although
>> if my tests were run with faulty hardware I wouldn't know how/why
>> that would give the above effect (such a 'regular aberration').
>
>> testing is more difficult than I thought...
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
> Please can you confirm:
> * Are the standby tests run while the primary is completely quiet?
autovacuum was on. Which is probably not a good idea - I'll try a few runs without it.
> * What OS is this? Can we use dtrace scripts?
Centos 5.4.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Murali M. Krishna | 2010-04-26 17:43:26 | Discarding the resulting rows |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-04-26 15:01:41 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |