Re: list of acknowledgments for PG15

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: list of acknowledgments for PG15
Date: 2022-10-11 09:02:58
Message-ID: 59e14cbd-9c8a-7182-2402-7827bd4fa301@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10.10.22 08:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> What remains is to
> define when is the cutoff point between "acknowledge in v15" versus
> "acknowledge in v16". I don't have a strong opinion about that,
> but I'd like it to be more than 24 hours before the 15.0 wrap.
> Could we make the cutoff be, say, beta1?

beta1 is too early, because a significant portion of the names comes in
after beta1. rc1 would be ok, I think.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jiye 2022-10-11 09:43:03 Is there any plan to support online schem change in postgresql?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-10-11 08:59:30 Re: Non-decimal integer literals