Re: Checksums by default?

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Checksums by default?
Date: 2017-02-24 19:49:07
Message-ID: 59b88df7-01f8-03ca-a212-2de7ade9ca34@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/24/17 12:30 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> In any case, we can't just build x86-64 packages with compile-time
> SSE4.1 checks.

Dumb question... since we're already discussing llvm for the executor,
would that potentially be an option here? AIUI that also opens the
possibility of using the GPU as well.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-02-24 19:55:21 Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-02-24 19:37:30 Re: Checksums by default?