Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results
Date: 2017-09-12 21:39:30
Message-ID: 59B85412.2000300@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/12/17 17:00, Tom Lane wrote:

> I did not see any reason given in the thread why we should need that.
> If you want to accumulate tuples ten at a time before you do something
> with them, you can do that now, by calling ExecutorRun with count=10.

Ah, that sounds easy enough. I'll withdraw the more-complicated suggestion.

-Chap

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2017-09-12 21:52:02 Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers)
Previous Message Serge Rielau 2017-09-12 21:26:40 Re: generated columns