Re: jsonpath syntax extensions

From: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jsonpath syntax extensions
Date: 2022-08-02 21:14:08
Message-ID: 5994dfa9-d2d6-ce0d-0286-174cfe7a5abc@timescale.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

As discussed in [1], we're taking this opportunity to return some
patchsets that don't appear to be getting enough reviewer interest.

This is not a rejection, since we don't necessarily think there's
anything unacceptable about the entry, but it differs from a standard
"Returned with Feedback" in that there's probably not much actionable
feedback at all. Rather than code changes, what this patch needs is more
community interest. You might

- ask people for help with your approach,
- see if there are similar patches that your code could supplement,
- get interested parties to agree to review your patch in a CF, or
- possibly present the functionality in a way that's easier to review
overall. [For this patchset in particular, it's been suggested to
split the extensions up into smaller independent pieces.]

(Doing these things is no guarantee that there will be interest, but
it's hopefully better than endlessly rebasing a patchset that is not
receiving any feedback from the community.)

Once you think you've built up some community support and the patchset
is ready for review, you (or any interested party) can resurrect the
patch entry by visiting

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/2482/

and changing the status to "Needs Review", and then changing the
status again to "Move to next CF". (Don't forget the second step;
hopefully we will have streamlined this in the near future!)

Thanks,
--Jacob

[1] https://postgr.es/m/f6344bbb-9141-e8c8-e655-d9baf40c4478%40timescale.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-08-02 21:18:19 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-02 21:05:41 Re: Consider parallel for lateral subqueries with limit