Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join
Date: 2018-02-13 20:46:56
Message-ID: 598940f9-e2d2-c7e8-30b2-aad6a14f9988@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14/02/18 09:27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
> would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
>
> Thoughts?
>
As 'wise' is a suffix, not a word in this situation - so it be combined
with 'partition'.

Hence 'enable_partitionwise_join' is more correct.

Cheers,
Gavin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-02-13 21:17:13 Python 3.7 support
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-02-13 20:45:43 Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join