Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)
Date: 2000-02-23 23:38:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     OTOH,  this new per-object-context stuff could hand down some
>     lifetime flag, let's say MCXT_UNTIL_STATEMENT, MCXT_UTIL_XEND
>     and  MCXT_UNTIL_INFINITY  to  start  from.

A good thing to keep in mind, but for the short term I'm not sure
we need it; the proposed new contexts are all for indefinite-lifetime
caches, so there's no chance to make them go away automatically.
Eventually we might have more uses for limited-lifetime contexts,

Something else that needs to be looked at is how memory contexts
are tied to "portals" presently.  That mechanism probably needs
to be redesigned.  I have to admit I don't understand what it's

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-02-23 23:46:44
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2000-02-23 23:21:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group