From: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] f0deab: fix: named statements were used when fetchSize was... |
Date: | 2017-07-24 12:57:15 |
Message-ID: | 5975eeabd2e92_32503fb4bc4b3c2c32397@hookshot-fe5-cp1-prd.iad.github.net.mail |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc
Commit: f0deabf7d87bb5bffeb84e9cd686eeb632aa9687
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/commit/f0deabf7d87bb5bffeb84e9cd686eeb632aa9687
Author: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Date: 2017-07-24 (Mon, 24 Jul 2017)
Changed paths:
M pgjdbc/src/main/java/org/postgresql/core/v3/QueryExecutorImpl.java
A pgjdbc/src/test/java/org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/ConcurrentStatementFetch.java
M pgjdbc/src/test/java/org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/Jdbc2TestSuite.java
M pgjdbc/src/test/java/org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/PreparedStatementTest.java
Log Message:
-----------
fix: named statements were used when fetchSize was non-zero and prepareThreshold=0 (#870)
Non-zero fetchSize triggers use of named portals (for subsequent fetch requests),
however named portals does not require to use named statements.
As per PostgreSQL documentation, named portals are automatically closed as transaction completes, so named portals should play well with transaction-based poolers.
fixes #869
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2017-07-24 21:13:51 | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] 5334cb: test: skip ConcurrentStatementFetch for PostgreSQL... |
Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2017-07-24 09:41:28 | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] 8287e7: test: assume integer datetimes for timestamp tests... |