| From: | Ken Geis <kgeis(at)speakeasy(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: patch: ResultSetTest.java |
| Date: | 2005-10-25 15:30:40 |
| Message-ID: | 5972f58a14bd577768dc806375d2872c@speakeasy.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Oct 25, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ken Geis <kgeis(at)speakeasy(dot)net> writes:
>> The problem came up for me because I am implementing binary
>> data transfer in the JDBC driver, and my first draft assumes that all
>> data transfers are binary.
>
> This is a really bad assumption, unless you intend never to support any
> user-defined types.
Yes, I know. That's why I said "first draft." My goal is to hack
together a driver that works in most cases and gets the community to
realize that binary data transfer is great and the JDBC driver needs
some active development.
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2005-10-25 17:01:00 | XADataSource interface |
| Previous Message | kgeis | 2005-10-25 15:06:47 | Re: patch: ResultSetTest.java |