Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

--On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 15:31:42 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Brusser <michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com> writes:
>> > Yes, we use NFS. Many of our customers use it as well.
>>
>> You are of course aware that this is not real safe...
>
> Maybe we should throw a "stop using NFS" if we get an EINTR from
> read()/write(), or explain what NFS options they should avoid.
Err, some of us use NetApp filers as NFS servers for our PG data, and I
believe that that negates at least some of the risk. I don't want to see
us (PG) not support something just because it *MAY* be unsafe.

LER

>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania
> 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749