Re: warning to publication created and wal_level is not set to logical

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Lucas Viecelli <lviecelli199(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: warning to publication created and wal_level is not set to logical
Date: 2019-07-12 15:33:35
Message-ID: 5927.1562945615@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 12:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> 3. AFAICS, the proposed test case changes will cause the core regression
>> tests to fail if wal_level is not replica. This is not true today ---
>> they pass regardless of wal_level --- and I object in the strongest terms
>> to making it otherwise.

> ... how about we just suppress WARNINGs for
> CREATE PUBLICATION commands that are expected to succeed? Like in the
> attached. This version passes installcheck with any wal_level.

WFM.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2019-07-12 15:59:06 Re: proposal - patch: psql - sort_by_size
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-07-12 15:33:21 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)