Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Well, do you like that? It was only a quick hack to get pg_dump
>> running with schemas; I'm not convinced we really want it to act
>> that way.
> We should probably put the languages into a schema.
Well, that would be the cleanest answer but it's surely overkill
given the small number of languages (and the fact that superuser
privilege is required to install one). I don't feel like doing
that much work just to make pg_dump's life a little easier...
regards, tom lane