Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
Date: 1999-08-25 13:46:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Just for a confirmation: I see REL6_5_PATCHES and REL6_5 Tag in the
> CVS respository. I thought that REL6_5_PATCHES is the Tag for the 6.5
> statble tree and would eventually become 6.5.2. If so, what is the
> REL6_5 Tag? Or I totally miss the point?

Right, REL6_5_PATCHES is the 6.5.* branch.  REL6_5 is just a tag ---
that is, it's effectively a frozen snapshot of the 6.5 release,
not an evolvable branch.

I am not sure if Marc intends to continue this naming convention
in future, or if it was just a mistake to create REL6_5 as a tag
not a branch.  I don't see a whole lot of use for the frozen tag

			regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 1999-08-25 13:50:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
Previous:From: F.J. CuberosDate: 1999-08-25 11:28:22
Subject: PATCH for Statement Triggers Support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group