| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Date: | 2020-04-27 12:34:20 |
| Message-ID: | 58de9544-be5b-f325-b5cc-cce4e2dda7d9@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/26/20 9:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Can you try
>
>> #docContent p {
>> - margin-bottom: 1rem !important;
>> + margin-bottom: 1rem;
>> }
>
>> and see how it looks?
>
> In some desultory looking around, I couldn't find anyplace in the
> existing text that that changes at all. And it does make the
> revised table markup render the way I want ... so +1.
Great. I do want to do a bit more desultory testing in the older
versions of the docs, but it can be committed whenever the -docs side is
ready.
Thanks,
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Coleman | 2020-04-27 12:40:15 | Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays |
| Previous Message | 曾文旌 | 2020-04-27 12:04:30 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |