Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?

From: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?
Date: 2017-04-16 19:27:02
Message-ID: 58F3C586.9050501@ssinger.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/10/2017 01:28 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> src/backend/replication/logical/launcher.c
> * Worker started and attached to our shmem. This check is safe
> * because only launcher ever starts the workers, so nobody can steal
> * the worker slot.
>
> The tablesync patch enabled even worker to start another worker.
> So the above assumption is not valid for now.
>
> This issue seems to cause the corner case where the launcher picks up
> the same worker slot that previously-started worker has already picked
> up to start another worker.
>
> Regards,
>

I'm not sure if what I am seeing is related to this or another issue.

If I create a subscription for a publication that doesn't exist (yet) I
see 'publication mypub does not exist" in the subscribers log

If I then create the publication on the publisher the error doesn't go
away, the worker process keeps spinning with the same error.

If I then drop the subscription and recreate it it works.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-04-16 20:11:12 Re: Logical replication - TRAP: FailedAssertion in pgstat.c
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-04-16 18:41:25 Re: Logical replication - TRAP: FailedAssertion in pgstat.c