Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 23:13:54 -0400 Tom Lane
<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>> Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it ****BREAKS**** UnixWare (If
>> y'all= =20
>> care).
>
> Unfixably? Or just a small oversight?
>
> I'm actually not worried about platforms that are actively being tested.
> It's the stuff that hasn't been confirmed recently that is going to be
> at risk.
I'm seeing failures with the 2nd patch as well. Seems like it's not liking
UnixWare's
cc defines.

the documentation is at:

http://www.lerctr.org:8458/

the cc man page is at:

http://www.lerctr.org:8458/en/man/html.1/cc.1.html

Tom, You still have an account here.

Bruce, if you'd like an account, that is easily arranged.

LER

>
> regards, tom lane

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749