Re: citext operator precedence fix

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: citext operator precedence fix
Date: 2011-09-22 01:12:02
Message-ID: 5863.1316653922@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Yeah, I'm worried about the possibility of parser failing to resolve
>> which operator is meant.

> Any idea of how to test for that? What kind of situations would make
> things difficult for the parser?

Not sure, but it would be underspecified cases such as 'x' = 'x' that
might have trouble. I may be worrying over nothing --- I'm just trying
to point out some trouble spots you'd better watch for while messing
with this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-09-22 01:49:27 Re: [v9.2] make_greater_string() does not return a string in some cases
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-09-22 01:06:40 Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer