Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This discussion also made me wonder whether the documentation could be
> a bit more explicit that prorows is intended as a planner estimate
> rather than an exact row count.
>> Estimated number of result rows (zero if not proretset)
+1. For the most part, I'd expect that to be obvious from the
fact that it's a constant ... but maybe being explicit would help.
regards, tom lane