Re: ECPG regression with DECLARE STATEMENT support

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Kuroda, Hayato" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Rushabh Lathia' <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ECPG regression with DECLARE STATEMENT support
Date: 2019-03-11 15:19:39
Message-ID: 57f96dfe7bbad14faf3c2400573f7f247fd0be2d.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I attached a simple bug-fixing patch.

I'm not happy with the situation, but don't see a better solution
either. Therefore I committed the change to get rid of the regression.

Thanks.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-03-11 15:59:50 Re: pgbench MAX_ARGS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-03-11 15:06:33 Re: Portability of strtod (was Re: pgsql: Include GUC's unit, if it has one, in out-of-range error message)