Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?

From: "Bayless Kirtley" <bkirt(at)cox(dot)net>
To: "List, Postgres" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?
Date: 2009-08-04 20:17:09
Message-ID: 57F37967555940D9BE46028B56BD97CC@dell2400
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Taylor" <ijabz(at)fastmail(dot)fm>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?

>> Of course you can always use Derby for testing the Postgres later. I have
>> found HSQLDB to be closer to Postgres than Derby is. I do seem to recall
>> the Netbeans group recommends using sever mode during development then
>> switch to imbedded for distribution. I have done it both ways with equal
>> success and similar efforts.
>>
>> Bayless
>>
>>
> Thanks I am trying to use Derby but fallen foul of Postgres array
> datatype which Derby doesn't support, Ive just had a quick look at HSQLDB
> and it doesn't appear to support it either.
>
> Paul
>
>
Yes, I'm afraid you're gonna be out of luck on finding the array type in any
of
the smaller embedded databases. Honestly, the beg project I've been on for a
year or so has used Postgres right through full development and testing.
It's
not hard to start and stop the database whenever I need to although I
usually
just leave it running.

Bayless

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gert 2009-08-04 20:53:40 Re: Error when assigning default value for function parameter
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-08-04 19:24:33 Re: timestamp with time zone, retrieving input offset/timezone