From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) |
Date: | 2014-05-06 21:31:23 |
Message-ID: | 57E8AA44-F816-45F2-BB61-5A854FFB0A97@justatheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On May 6, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Stuck on the naming question. I'd be willing to do the patch legwork
>> if we had a consensus (or even a proposal) for what to rename the
>> current jsonb_ops to.
>
> Well, then, we only have a few days to come up with a name.
What are the options?
D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-06 22:20:53 | Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-05-06 21:20:20 | Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-06 21:35:15 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-06 21:26:02 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4 |