Re: Uber migrated from Postgres to MySQL

From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Uber migrated from Postgres to MySQL
Date: 2016-07-27 07:34:10
Message-ID: 579863F2.8020205@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 27/07/2016 10:15, Condor wrote:
> On 26-07-2016 21:04, Dorian Hoxha wrote:
>> Many comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12166585
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4uph84/why_uber_engineering_switched_from_postgres_to/
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Honestly, I've never heard of anyone doing that. But it sounds like
>>> they had good reasons.
>>>
>>> https://eng.uber.com/mysql-migration/
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
>
> They are right for upgrades.
> It's a hard to shutdown 1 TB database and wait couple of days pg_upgrade to finish upgrade and meanwhile database is offline.
> In some distros after upgrade of PG version you don't have old binary and library, need to do full dump and restore that take time and disk space.

Our last 1TB upgrade from 9.0 -> 9.3 went like a charm in something like seconds. (with the -k option)
However, be warned that the planing and testing took one full week.

>
>
> Regards,
> Hristo S.
>
>
>
>
>

--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message thomas veymont 2016-07-27 08:54:22 low perfomances migrating from 9.3 to 9.5
Previous Message Marc Fournier 2016-07-27 07:30:29 Re: Uber migrated from Postgres to MySQL