| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API |
| Date: | 2002-06-09 15:59:55 |
| Message-ID: | 5786.1023638395@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Returning GUC variable "SHOW ALL" results as a query result has been
> discussed before, and I thought there was agreement that it was a
> desirable backend feature.
So it is, but I had expected it to be implemented by changing the
behavior of SHOW, same as we did for EXPLAIN.
> Is the approach in my patch still too ugly to allow a builtin SRF (set
> the function return type to 0 in pg_proc.h, create a view and fix the
> pg_proc entry during initdb)?
Too ugly for my taste anyway ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-06-09 16:28:22 | Re: Project scheduling issues (was Re: Per tuple overhead, |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-06-09 10:38:26 | Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-09 19:46:21 | Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-06-09 02:32:04 | Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API |