Re: WIP: About CMake v2

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date: 2016-06-30 20:18:00
Message-ID: 57757E78.9070803@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/30/2016 06:26 AM, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Yury Zhuravlev
> <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Hello Hackers.
>>
>> I decided to talk about the current state of the project:
>> 1. Merge with 9.6 master. 2. plpython2, plpython3, plperl, pltcl, plsql all
>> work correctly (all tests pass).
>> 3. Works done for all contrib modules. 4. You can use gettext, .po->.mo will
>> have converted by CMake. 5. All test pass under some Linux, FreeBSD,
>> Solaris10 (on Sparc), Windows MSVC 2015. MacOSX I think not big trouble too.
>> 6. Prototype for PGXS (with MSVC support) done.
>> I think is very big progress but I came across one problem.
>> I not have access to many OS and platforms. For each platform need tests and
>> small fixes. I can't develop and give guarantee without it.
> can we use our buildfarm infrastructure for this, Andrew ?

When I get some time I intend to do some work with this to see what
might be involved in enabling this in the buildfarm. I imagine it will
probably involve something similar to the effort that moving to git
entailed.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-06-30 20:19:40 Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-06-30 17:13:12 Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels