Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: "Robert Haas *EXTERN*" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Functions used in index definitions shouldn't be changed
Date: 2014-11-21 15:06:04
Message-ID: 5770.1416582364@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:
> There is also the possibility to add syntax like this:
> CREATE OR REPLACE [FORCE] FUNCTION ...
> What do you think about that? It would protect the casual user but allow
> the expert to do it anyway.

I don't see any great attraction to that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-11-21 15:12:40 Re: superuser() shortcuts
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2014-11-21 14:57:06 Re: RLS with check option - surprised design