| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: scheduler in core |
| Date: | 2010-02-21 01:50:16 |
| Message-ID: | 5752884231155883891@unknownmsgid |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 20, 2010, at 8:06 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:
> There is zero technical reason for this to be in core.
>
> That doesn't mean it isn't a really good idea. It would be nice to
> have
> a comprehensive job scheduling solution that allows me to continue
> abstract away from external solutions and operating system
> dependencies.
Well put. That pretty much sums up my feelings on this perfectly.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2010-02-21 01:50:45 | Re: scheduler in core |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-21 01:11:50 | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |