| From: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods |
| Date: | 2016-06-01 11:25:49 |
| Message-ID: | 574EC63D.4060804@sigaev.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> As far as I can see, COMMENT ON has no support for access methods.
>>> Wouldn't we want to add it as it is created by a command? On top of
>>> that, perhaps we could have a backslash command in psql to list the
>>> supported access methods, like \dam[S]? The system methods would be in
>>> this case all the in-core ones.
>>
>> +1.
>
> Are there other opinions? That's not a 9.6 blocker IMO, so I could get
> patches out for 10.0 if needed.
I missed that on review process, but I'm agree it should be implemented.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-06-01 11:29:32 | strange explain in upstream - subplan 1 twice - is it bug? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-06-01 10:05:44 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |