Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Date: 2016-05-31 20:06:05
Message-ID: 574DEEAD.60304@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/31/2016 01:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The name should be closely related to what we use for #3. I could go for
> max_total_parallel_workers for #2 and max_parallel_workers for #3.
> Or maybe max_parallel_workers_total?

How about parallel_worker_pool?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-31 20:12:42 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-31 20:04:41 Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?