Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ignoring BRIN for HOT updates (was: -udpates seems broken)
Date: 2023-03-20 10:11:27
Message-ID: 57301df5-0e6e-1276-17e2-298f386b21a7@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/14/23 15:41, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 14:49, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>
>> If you agree with these changes, I'll get it committed.
>
> Yes, thanks!
>

I've tweaked the patch per the last round of comments, cleaned up the
commit message a bit (it still talked about unused bit in tuple header
and so on), and pushed it.

Thanks for fixing the issues that got the patch reverted last year!

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-03-20 10:14:49 Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-03-20 10:00:12 Save a few bytes in pg_attribute