From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <jdavis(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations. |
Date: | 2023-06-10 05:33:31 |
Message-ID: | 573014.1686375211@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Attached a patch to mark those functions as PARALLEL UNSAFE, which
> fixes the problem.
> Alternatively, I could just take out that line, as those SQL functions
> are not controlled by the MAINTAIN privilege. But for consistency I
> think it's a good idea to leave it in so that index functions are
> called with the right search path for amcheck.
I concur with the upthread objection that it is way too late in
the release cycle to be introducing a breaking change like this.
I request that you revert it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-06-10 15:11:54 | pgsql: Revert "Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance opera |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-06-10 04:35:38 | Re: could not extend file "base/5/3501" with FileFallocate(): Interrupted system call |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2023-06-10 06:51:34 | Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-06-10 05:26:46 | Re: Cleaning up threading code |