Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-04-29 18:50:02
Message-ID: 5723ACDA.8080407@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/29/2016 11:36 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:

> Egos.
>
> Consider PgLogical, who is working on this outside of 2Q?
>
>
> Thank you for volunteering to assist. What would you like to work on?

You are very welcome. I have been testing as you know. I would be happy
to continue that and also was going to look into having a subscriber
validate if it is connecting to a subscribed node or not which is the
error I ran into.

I am also interested in creating user docs (versus reference docs).

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-04-29 19:07:46 Re: Replying to a pgsql-committers email by CC'ing hackers
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-04-29 18:44:04 Re: Replying to a pgsql-committers email by CC'ing hackers