Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion
Date: 2017-11-29 00:38:31
Message-ID: 57236221-dcc2-145a-957f-1f8c608356ae@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/11/29 0:52, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I am out of time for today but will try to look at this some more tomorrow.
>
> Upon closer study this seems to definitely be a correct fix, so I have
> committed it. Apologies for my earlier confusion.

Thank you.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-11-29 00:40:12 Re: With commit 4e5fe9ad19, range partition missing handling for the NULL partition key
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-11-29 00:25:04 Re: [HACKERS] PG10 partitioning - odd behavior/possible bug