| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
| Date: | 2017-07-25 14:38:02 |
| Message-ID: | 5716.1500993482@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think the real question is where do we go from here. Ashutosh has
> proposed a patch up-thread based on a suggestion from Andrew, but it
> is not clear if we want to go there as that seems to be bypassing
> handshake mechanism.
That definitely seems like the wrong route to me. If the resulting
code works, it would at best be accidental.
> The other tests and analysis seem to indicate
> that the new version Perl binaries on Windows are getting built with
> flags that are incompatible with what we use for plperl and it is not
> clear why perl is using those flags. Do you think we can do something
> at our end to make it work or someone should check with Perl community
> about it?
It would be a good idea to find somebody who knows more about how these
Perl distros are built.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-25 14:41:32 | Re: estimation for join results cardinality is sometimes more than the product of the downstream nodes' |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-07-25 14:37:50 | Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows |