Re: OS scheduler bugs affecting high-concurrency contention

Hi,

On 04/16/2016 04:15 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> There is a paper that any one interested in performance at high
> concurrency, especially in Linux, should read[1]. While doing
> other work, a group of researchers saw behavior that they suspected
> was due to scheduler bugs in Linux. There were no tools that made
> proving that practical, so they developed such a tool set and used
> it to find four bugs in the Linux kernel which were introduced in
> these releases, have not yet been fixed, and have this following
> maximum impact when running NAS benchmarks, based on running with
> and without the researchers' fixes for the bugs:
>
> 2.6.32: 22%
> 2,6.38: 13x
> 3.9: 27x
> 3.19: 138x
>
> That's right -- one of these OS scheduler bugs in production
> versions of Linux can make one of NASA's benchmarks run for 138
> times as long as it does without the bug. I don't feel that I can
> interpret the results of any high-concurrency benchmarks in a
> meaningful way without knowing which of these bugs were present in
> the OS used for the benchmark. Just as an example, it is helpful
> to know that the benchmarks Andres presented were run on 3.16, so
> it would have three of these OS bugs affecting results, but not the
> most severe one. I encourage you to read the paper an draw your
> own conclusions.
>
> Anyway, please don't confuse this thread with the one on the
> "snapshot too old" patch -- I am still working on that and will
> post results there when they are ready.

Thanks for the link, appreciated.

On slightly related topic, Jens Axboe proposed a patchset [1]
to improve the performance of background buffered writeback.

On Lwn.net an article about the issue at hand has been recently published [2].

Maybe this work could somewhat solve the problem experienced by PostgreSQL users
while checkpoint process flushes all pending changes to disk and recycles the
transaction logs.

--
Andrea Suisani
suisani(at)opinioni(dot)net
Demetra opinioni.net srl

[1] "[PATCHSET v3][RFC] Make background writeback not suck"
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2186732

[2] "Toward less-annoying background writeback"
https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/682582/93d9e5b6bed03a32/