Re: Top features in 9.6?

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Top features in 9.6?
Date: 2016-04-14 19:17:00
Message-ID: 570FECAC.4060401@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 4/12/16 5:13 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
>>> Er... we don't provide a warning ahead of time in the logs or something?
>>
>> No. That would be a little strange, honestly. I have to assume that
>> many wraparound vacuums go totally unnoticed; how would you
>> distinguish the ones that are likely to annoy somebody from the other
>> ones?
>
> I suggest providing a config option for those warnings

Warnings just plaster around the real problem, which is we need more
intelligent Autovac launcher and worker scheduling.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-04-15 14:48:15 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-04-14 18:16:59 PgConf.US media tracking