Re: snapshot too old, configured by time

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Date: 2016-04-08 21:11:53
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/8/16 4:30 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Sadly, I forgot to include the reviewer information when writing the
>> commit messages. :-(
> Oh well. I'm just glad we got the patch over the line. I think that
> there are some types of users that will very significantly benefit
> from this patch.

I'm also very happy to see this go in. While I used to dread the
"snapshot too old" error back in my O****e architect days it's nice to
have the option, especially when it can be configured by time rather
than by size.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-04-08 21:45:11 Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-08 21:02:12 Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries