Re: Speedup twophase transactions

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date: 2016-04-08 12:49:16
Message-ID: 5707A8CC.6080206@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/07/2016 02:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So recovery is conflicting here. My guess is that this patch is
> missing some lock cleanup.
>
> With the test case attached in my case the COMMIT PREPARED record does
> not even get replayed.
>

Should we create an entry for the open item list [0] for this, due to
the replication lag [1] ?

CommitFest entry [2]
Original commit [3]

Cc'ed RMT.

[0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.6_Open_Items
[1]
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E7497864-DE11-4099-83F5-89FB97AF5073@postgrespro.ru
[2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/523/
[3]
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=978b2f65aa1262eb4ecbf8b3785cb1b9cf4db78e

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-04-08 12:58:57 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2016-04-08 12:45:49 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.