| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robbie Harwood <rharwood(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support |
| Date: | 2016-04-05 20:39:48 |
| Message-ID: | 57042294.70308@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/5/16 1:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Btw, those seem like small things to me, and my comments have been
> addressed, so I have switched the patch as ready for committer. I
> guess that Stephen would be the one to look at it.
I have also run this patch through my tests and didn't find any
problems. I agree that it is ready for committer.
I don't see a problem with using the top memory context but whoever
commits it may feel differently. I'm happy to leave that decision up to
them.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-04-05 20:58:17 | Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-05 20:32:00 | Re: Yet another small patch - reorderbuffer.c:1099 |