Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2018-04-23 01:04:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/04/21 0:58, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit Langote wrote:
>> PS: git grep "partition by hash\|PARTITION BY HASH" on src/test indicates
>> that there are hash partitioning related tests in create_table,
>> foreign_key, and partition_join files as well. Do we want to use the
>> custom opclass in those files as well?
> By the way, let me suggest 'git grep -i' instead.

Ah, thanks.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-04-23 02:09:22 Re: Toast issues with OldestXmin going backwards
Previous Message Miles Elam 2018-04-23 00:23:42 Format base - Code contribution