Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?
Date: 2016-03-31 15:44:35
Message-ID: 56FD45E3.7030107@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/30/2016 09:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 31 March 2016 at 07:49, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?
>
>> Why would we want to?
>
>> The cost is small.
>
> Surely you jest. Windows is the single biggest PITA platform from a
> portability perspective, and has been in every release cycle since we
> first had a Windows port, and there is no close second.

Add to that the cost on extension authors. I would surely *love* to dump
Windows support in PL/R as it is a major league PITA. It is probably an
understatement to say that over the last 10+ years, 95+% of the time I
have spent maintaining and supporting PL/R has been directly
attributable to the Windows port.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-03-31 15:44:46 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2016-03-31 15:29:37 Re: WIP: Access method extendability